Skip to main content

Smith/Doorstop Press Release



We are delighted to report that at an event held at the British Library on Friday evening, and from a very strong shortlist, it was announced the £5000 Michael Marks Publishers Award was given to Smith/Doorstop.


Alan Jenkins, Chair of judges said of the Poetry Business In the twenty-five years since they gave the world a ‘joint pamphlet’ of poems by Clare Chapman and one by Simon Armitage, Smith/Doorstop have become a byword for excellence and consistency: arresting work from a wide range of highly talented poets both new and renowned, in a clean, elegant and immediately recognizable format. Their regular showings on the shortlist for the Michael Marks Pamphlet Award since its inception, and two shortlisted titles this year, tell their own story. May it go on for another twenty-five years at least.


Smith/Doorstop Press is the pamphlet imprint of the Poetry Business, which began life in 1986 on an enterprise allowance in Huddersfield and is now based at Bank Street Arts in Sheffield. A dynamic publisher and writer-development agency, it has remained a small, grass-roots business, while becoming 'one of the most vital and vitalising literature organisations in the country' (Andrew Motion). As well as recent pamphlets by Simon Armitage and Ian McMillan, Smith/Doorstop continue to ‘talent-spot brilliant new poets’ (The Independent), including Paul Bentley (with a tour de force about the Miner's Strike) and the Buddhist poet Maitreyabandhu, both of whom were themselves shortlisted for the Michael Marks Pamphlet award.
Pamphlets are a quite separate enterprise to our books – partly because we can take more risks but also because a pamphlet has its own shape and purpose – isn't just a stepping stone or part of a new book – and is a satisfying read and an attractive object in its own right.


Continually encouraged by the standard of work that comes to it through the Poetry Business Book and Pamphlet competition and through submissions to The North magazine, we are immensely proud of our list and look forward to continuing to work with them while discovering still more writers whose work deserves to be read.


Comments

Poetry Pleases! said…
Dear Todd

With over 6000 books in our house, unfortunately, we don't have a great deal of room for pamphlets as well!

Best wishes from Simon

Popular posts from this blog

CLIVE WILMER'S THOM GUNN SELECTED POEMS IS A MUST-READ

THAT HANDSOME MAN  A PERSONAL BRIEF REVIEW BY TODD SWIFT I could lie and claim Larkin, Yeats , or Dylan Thomas most excited me as a young poet, or even Pound or FT Prince - but the truth be told, it was Thom Gunn I first and most loved when I was young. Precisely, I fell in love with his first two collections, written under a formalist, Elizabethan ( Fulke Greville mainly), Yvor Winters triad of influences - uniquely fused with an interest in homerotica, pop culture ( Brando, Elvis , motorcycles). His best poem 'On The Move' is oddly presented here without the quote that began it usually - Man, you gotta go - which I loved. Gunn was - and remains - so thrilling, to me at least, because so odd. His elegance, poise, and intelligence is all about display, about surface - but the surface of a panther, who ripples with strength beneath the skin. With Gunn, you dressed to have sex. Or so I thought.  Because I was queer (I maintain the right to lay claim to that

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se.  What do I mean by smart?

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".